Skip to main content


#Stratasys uses 10 patents, two of them orginally from #Makerbot (anyone remember?) to sue #Bambulab in two separate US court cases. Patent infringement claimed on using a heated bed, using a purge tower, force detection etc. Seems Stratasys is patent trolling really hard ATM. https://www.tomshardware.com/3d-printing/3d-printer-maker-bambu-lab-faces-patent-infringement-lawsuits-that-could-threaten-hobbyist-3d-printing-in-general

#3dprinting #3dPrinter #patents #patenttroll

in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:

And before the panic sets in: These are *US* patent cases. Patent cases are *always* country specific. So until they (Stratasys) also file patent infringement cases in other countries, no need to worry, especially here in the EU (where I live).
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:

The task of Bambulab (and hopefully also the #3dprinting community) is to collect so-called #PriorArt, showing that what was patented was already known and used before the patent was filed/granted. Especially in the case of a heated bed, which was filed in 2014, that seems to be quite easy to do.
in reply to Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:

When reading a patent, ignore everything but the claims and priority date. The claims are the core of the patent, everything else is description and blah-blah. The priority date is important for showing prior art. If you can prove that what the claims describe has been known *before* the priority date, that is a clear sign that the patent should be invalidated.

This website uses cookies to recognize revisiting and logged in users. You accept the usage of these cookies by continue browsing this website.

⇧