Call for #OpenPeerReview: https://commentbfp.sp.unipi.it/maria-chiara-pievatolo-the-scale-and-the-sword-statal-science-and-research-evaluation/
We talk a lot about how research is evaluated. But we do not always ask who is entitled to evaluate research and what is the legitimacy (even from the perspective of #openscience) of a system in which evaluation is in the hands of bureaucrats, or government-appointed researchers acting with bureaucratic power. The origin of the question is Italian, but its scope is global.
To contribute see the gray box at the bottom of https://commentbfp.sp.unipi.it
We talk a lot about how research is evaluated. But we do not always ask who is entitled to evaluate research and what is the legitimacy (even from the perspective of #openscience) of a system in which evaluation is in the hands of bureaucrats, or government-appointed researchers acting with bureaucratic power. The origin of the question is Italian, but its scope is global.
To contribute see the gray box at the bottom of https://commentbfp.sp.unipi.it
Bollettino telematico di filosofia politica | Open peer review, put to the test
English version below Questa sezione del Bollettino telematico di filosofia politica è dedicata alla sperimentazione della revisione paritaria aperta. La lista degli articoli offerti alla revisione paritaria è visibile qui.commentbfp.sp.unipi.it
Maria Chiara Pievatolo
in reply to Maria Chiara Pievatolo • • •Ranking di riviste e fiducia nei database proprietari – Open Science @Unimi
openscience.unimi.itShamar reshared this.