Skip to main content

in reply to Gilbert Busana

I see you recommend # # #, but those are still centralized services. What about @radicle ? A decentralized source host?
No inbuilt CI (just like gitea and sourcehut), but at least you won't depend on a centralized service (FLOSS or not)
in reply to Gilbert Busana

A self-hosted instance of something that works right now is already an improvement over being stuck on a centralized software managed by somebody else.

Also, sourcehut already allows decentralized interactions, since it works mostly through e-mail; afaik you would need an account on that specific sourcehut instance only to be granted direct access to the repository (rather than contributing via patches / PR-ish-es)

@loveisgrief@Software Freedom Conservancy
in reply to Gilbert Busana

We tried to communicate w/ # re: #; they have outright refused to answer community questions on Copilot & took it for-profit. Copilot ignores copyleft requirements; so it's time to # https://GiveUpGitHub.org
in reply to Gilbert Busana

I would love to do this but self-hosting seems like the only way of maintaining control and independence and that seems far too high a bar for learning and maintenance, as someone without much familiarity in web tech.
in reply to Gilbert Busana

@ben🌱ui@Software Freedom Conservancy

For people with some familiarity with tech, but not enough to comfortably host a full multi user web forge, there are also things like gitolite+cgit that are pretty limited in their feature set, but may be enough for a lot of usecases, and are much simpler and low effort to host.

This website uses cookies to recognize revisiting and logged in users. You accept the usage of these cookies by continue browsing this website.