Skip to main content

Search

Items tagged with: OSI


#Debian classify the kind of #AI systems that the #OSI's #OSAID defines as #opensource, as #ToxicCandy: https://salsa.debian.org/deeplearning-team/ml-policy/-/blob/master/ML-Policy.rst

Without training data you cannot ecercise the freedom to study a #ML system and your ability to modify it is severely limited to fine tuning.

Which is like to say that windows is open source because you can tweak the registry.

For these reasons some open source developers are already moving beyond OSI: https://opensourcedeclaration.org

You are welcome to join!

It's not just matter of securing the #OSD, but to update it with a truly open process, with all developers, artists, musicians, data scientists... who contribute their time and valuable skills to open source: https://opensourcedefinition.org/wip/

@mawhrin @tante @biocrusoe


Wow!

It's impressive how "open" is @OpenSource!

I've been silenced on #OSI forum for ten days after posting https://discuss.opensource.org/t/privacy-or-real-data-transparency-a-false-dichotomy/661.

Now I'm back... and guess what?

I'm too dangerous to #OpenWashing.

šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø

#OpenSource #OpenSourceAI #OSAID #AIAct #privacy


TIL that a #BlackBox #AI can be defined as #OpenSource.

Granting the ā€œfreedom to fine tuneā€ cannot be enough to qualify as Open Source AI just like granting the ā€œfreedom to configureā€ cannot be enough to qualify as Open Source Software.

Yet, for #OSI it's enough.

And you can't provide effective solutions to the problem they pretend to see into making training data available.

Or you will be silenced.

https://opensource.org/blog/copyright-law-makes-a-case-for-requiring-data-information-rather-than-open-datasets-for-open-source-ai

#OpenSourceAI #OpenWashing #OpenWashingAI
#OSS #OSAI #AIAct #BigTech #GAFAM


RT @OpenSourceOrg
Affiliate candidate @gblondelle responds to candidate questions asked by @luis_in_brief. https://opensource.org/board-member/gael-blondelle/ #OSI #OSIelections


Out of curiosity: do you know who was the most prominent sponsor at #OSI when they refused the #SSPL?

Calling the SSPL a "proprietary license" on this ground is a bit misleading.

It's not an opensource license if and only if OSI gatekeeping is what qualify #OSS (hint: it doesn't, they always refuse this responsibility): they did not give their bless, because license proliferation, yadda yadda... but they blessed the #CAL license which was much more... "innovative".

MongoDB's license is a slightly modified #AGPLv3 but... OSI won't beat the hands that feed them, right?

This website uses cookies to recognize revisiting and logged in users. You accept the usage of these cookies by continue browsing this website.

ā‡§